Effect of the historic Spanish heatwave over glycemic control in adult patients with type 1 diabetes.

AIM: To evaluate the effect of the historic Spanish heatwave (9th-26th July 2022) over glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS: Cross-sectional retrospective analysis of adult patients with T1D in Castilla-La Mancha (south-central Spanish region) using intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) during and after the heatwave. Primary outcome was change in time in range (TIR) 3.0-10 mmol/L (70-180 mg/dL) of interstitial glucose in the two weeks following the heatwave. RESULTS: A total of 2701 T1D patients were analyzed. We detected a TIR reduction of 4.0 % (95 % CI -3.4, -4.6; P < 0.001) in the two weeks following the heatwave. Patients in the highest daily scan frequency quartile (>13 scans/day) during the heatwave showed the greatest deterioration in TIR after it concluded (-5.4 % [95 % CI -6.5, -4.3; P < 0.001]). The percentage of patients meeting all the recommendations of the International Consensus of Time in Range was greater during the heatwave than after it ended (10.6 % vs. 8.4 %, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Adults with T1D had better glycemic control during the historic Spanish heatwave compared to the following period.

To evaluate the use and clinical effect of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes: Results of a multicentre study.

AIM: To evaluate the use and clinical effect of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in a public health service scenario. METHOD: Cross-sectional retrospective analysis of all patients with T1D and medical indication for isCGM use from a cohort followed since 2010 at Castilla-La Mancha Public Health Service (Spain). Primary outcome was HbA1c change during the first year of follow-up after isCGM initiation. Secondary outcomes included evaluation of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), isCGM and insulin use, along with glycometric indexes. RESULTS: A total of 945 T1D patients were analyzed. Median age was 49.5 years (IQ range 19.0 years) and T1D duration of 28.9 years (IQ range 14.0 years). The most frequent insulin therapy alternatives were multiple daily injections (85%) followed by insulin pump (11%). Eighty percent of the patients were active isCGM users with a 90% of adherence to the device. Patients showed a mean daily scan frequency of 10.1±6.4scans/day. Daily SMBG reduced by -3.5 test/day [95% CI -3.7, -3.2; P<0.001]. We detected an HbA1c reduction of -0.3% (-4mmol/mol) [95% CI -0.2, -0.4 (-3, -5); P<0.001] at the end of the follow-up. An inverse correlation between HbA1c levels at the end of the follow-up and daily frequency of isCGM scanning (R=-0.34, P<0.001) was observed. Dropout rate was 4%, and 4% of patients were not willing to use isCGM. CONCLUSIONS: Adult patients with T1D improved glycaemic control after isCGM initiation in a public health service scenario. Despite described clinical benefits, a higher than expected percentage of patients were not using isCGM technology. NCT05095610.

Is HOMA-IR a potential screening test for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in adults with type 2 diabetes?

BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the commonest hepatic disease in many parts of the World, with particularly high prevalence in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). However, a good screening test for NAFLD in T2DM has not been established. Insulin resistance (IR) has been associated with NAFLD, and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), a good proxy for IR, may represent an affordable predictive test which could be easily applied in routine clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of HOMA-IR for NAFLD in T2DM and sought to estimate an optimal cut-off value for discriminating NAFLD from non-NAFLD cases. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 56 well-controlled patients with T2DM (HbAc1<7%, on oral anti-diabetic and/or glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist treatment), who had at least one glucose and insulin level determined, and at least one hepatic imaging test (ultrasonography or computed tomography scanning). RESULTS: The prevalence of NAFLD was 73.2% (95% CI: 59.7-84.2) in our population. An association between HOMA-IR and NAFLD was found (OR 1.5; 95% CI: 1.03-2.1; p=0.033), independently of transaminases, fat percentage, BMI and triglyceride levels. The AUROC curve of HOMA-IR for identifying NAFLD was 80.7% (95% CI: 68.9-92.5). A value of HOMA-IR of 4.5 was estimated to be an optimal threshold for discriminating NAFLD from non-NAFLD cases. CONCLUSION: HOMA-IR is independently associated with the presence of NAFLD in adults with T2DM, and might potentially be applied in clinical practice as a screen for this condition.